"Only Luke is with me." These are the words penned by the Apostle Paul to Timothy (2 Tim. 4:11), as Paul wrote to the young evangelist from a Roman prison. It was the last of Paul's letters. Although we have no inspired record of Paul's death, most historians agree that he was beheaded in Rome in the mid-60's - shortly after writing this letter.
Last words are always important. And as I read the end of 2 Timothy, especially verses 9 through 22, Paul's reflective thoughts are moving. Especially that short sentence mentioning Luke - "Only Luke is with me."
Our Wednesday evening study in Acts last night turned my thoughts to Luke. As we began chapter 27, that little pronoun "we" appeared again. As the writer of Acts, Luke tells us when he is involved in the action by using that simple indicator.
Paul was a prisoner, and was being sent with other prisoners to Rome. It was curious to me that Luke was joining him - why would the Roman authorities even allow Luke to accompany Paul under these circumstances? From my reading, it appears that it was unheard of in this age for a prisoner to be allowed to have companions, and I found only two ways that the Roman authorities would have permitted this - either Luke (and Aristarchus, who also accompanied Paul to Rome) would have to take the position as Paul's slaves, or Festus (the procurator before whom Paul had his final hearing in Acts 25) allowed it, believing in Paul's innocence, and thinking that by showing kindness to Paul, Caesar would look favorably upon Festus.
Regardless of why it was allowed, to me the more pressing question is why would Luke WANT to accompany a band of prisoners on a dangerous voyage by ship? I think the answer to that is found in Paul's statement of 2 Timothy 4:11 - "Only Luke is with me." Those five words speak volumes. As Paul concludes his letter to the Colossians, he mentions Luke in verse 14 as sending greetings, along with Demas. Likewise, in Paul's letter to Philemon (vs 24), he sends greetings from Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke. But by the time we get to the end of Paul's last letter, we learn that Demas had forsaken Paul, going back to the ways of the world. Others had traveled to various areas, likely to preach the gospel, and that "Only Luke is with me."
There's a lot we can say about Luke. Luke is the only gospel writer to give us the account of the birth of John the Baptist, as well as the birth and early life of Jesus. Only in Luke's gospel can we read the life-changing parables Jesus taught of the Good Samaritan, the rich fool, and the wonderful trio of lost and found - the lost sheep, lost coin, and prodigal son. Without Luke, we wouldn't know about the rich man and Lazarus, nor would we have insight into the conversation Jesus had with the thief on the cross.
But what I want to focus on here is that Luke was Paul's constant friend. He could be counted on. He would not leave, no matter what life brought. He was willing and eager to go through the storms of life to love and support his friend, even at his own peril.
I hope you have a friend like Luke. I am blessed with several. But more important than having that kind of friend, I need to ask myself am I that kind of friend to others? Can I be counted on? Do others look at me as someone they can call on to help them weather the storms of life? When one of my friends is in a bind, are they immediately comfortable dialing my number, or do they hesitate? When asked if I would accompany them through a difficult journey, perhaps putting myself in peril, would my friends automatically think of me as the friend who would do that for them?
I've written a lot lately about our relationships with one another - being kind, understanding, looking beneath the surface, building relationships, and opening ourselves up to others. As I continue to think about that, and strive to grow in those areas, I now add another dimension. I want to be a Luke, don't you? I can think of no greater compliment or blessing than to have just one person say, "Only Tracy is with me."
No comments:
Post a Comment